!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> Supercomputing Institute Vol. 15 No. 1: Contaminant Spread

Supercomputing Institute Research Bulletin online

Volume 15 Number 1

December 1998

 

Predicting Dissolved Contaminant Spread in Heterogeneous Ground Water Aquifers
Research Scholars
New Resources
Summer Interns
Contaminant Spread
Liquid-Solid Flow
Short Contact-Time Reactors
Preconditioning Symposium
Mantle Plumes
Bioremediation
Research Reports

rediction of dissolved contaminant spread in ground water aquifers is necessary in designing ground water protection and remediation measures. These predictions are usually accomplished by solving the convection-dispersion equation (CDE). The dispersion coefficient in the CDE is assumed to be constant in standard practice, but this coefficient is now recognized to depend on space and time.

The research team of Professor John L. Nieber, Graduate Students AbdelKarim Abulaban, Paul Oduro, and Hung Nguyen, and Research Associate Cam Nguyen of the Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department at the University of Minnesota have undertaken an effort to quantify effects of multiscale spatial heterogeneity on solute plume spread. In addition, they are working on ways to estimate the dispersion coefficient in natural porous media. In this work, solute plumes are simulated using a particle tracking random walk solution of the CDE. This work is being accomplished in cooperation with Dr. John Peters and Dr. Stacy Howington from the United States Army Waterways Experiment Station Laboratory in Vicksburg, Mississippi. This cooperation is supported by the Army High-Performance Computing Research Center at the University of Minnesota.

Sample results of the current work are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Sample ground water velocity fields are shown in four different conditions for an aquifer with dimensions of 200 meters by 2000 meters. In Figures 1a-1c, velocity fields for various levels of hydraulic conductivity (K2) heterogeneity are shown. For each field, the hydraulic conductivity is statistically homogeneous (constant mean and variance of K2). Note that the color scale for each graph is relative to the maximum value of the variable depicted in that graph. The variable s represents the standard deviation of ln( K2) and L represents the spatial correlation of ln(K2). In contrast, the velocity field shown in Figure 1d is for the condition where multiple scales of K2heterogeneity (mean and variance of K2are not constant) are represented. Solute plumes for a conservative solute (non-sorbing, non-degrading) were generated using each of these velocity fields, and the plume at 500 days associated with each velocity field is displayed immediately beneath the associated velocity field plot. It is observed in Figures 1a-1c that the solute plume spread increases as the values of s and L increase. The plume in Figure 1d is even more spread, showing the effects of the multiple scales of heterogeneity. The simulation of the solute plume for each velocity field was performed using 200,000 particles with the solute initially concentrated within a 10 m2 area. Each of these simulations required a high- resolution representation of the aquifer hydraulic conductivity.

Further research is attempting to mimic high-resolution simulations with a simpler particle tracking model. The simpler model incorporates multiscale spatial heterogeneity into a random velocity generator superimposed onto a mean flow field. Because of this, high-resolution representations are not needed. A solute plume generated with this approach is shown in Figure 2.

In future research, this group will derive parameters from the high-resolution fields to be input into the simpler dispersion model. This work will make it capable to closely predict behavior of the high-resolution simulations. Further work will investigate the effects of solute sorption, multicomponent chemical reactions, and biodegradation on solute plume behavior when multiscale spatial heterogeneity is present.

Figure 1a: Longitudinal velocity and concentration profile of ground water for s = 0.5 and L = 5 m.


Figure 1b: Longitudinal velocity and concentration profile of ground water for s = 1.0 and L = 10 m.


Figure 1c: Longitudinal velocity and concentration profile of ground water for s = 2.0 and L = 20 m.


Figure 1d: Longitudinal velocity and concentration profile of ground water for the sum of the hydraulic conductivity fields for figures 1a-1c.


Figure 2: A solute plume generated with a random velocity generator, representing multiscale spatial heterogeneity, superimposed onto a mean flow field.


previous articlenext article this issue

 
HOME | BULLETINS | CONTACT US | PREVIOUS ARTICLE | NEXT ARTICLE | THIS ISSUE

 
 

This information is available in alternative formats upon request by individuals with disabilities. Please send email to alt-format@msi.umn.edu or call 612-624-0528.
 

URL: http://
This page last modified on  
Website related questions or problems should be directed to webmaster@msi.umn.edu
The Supercomputing Institute does not collect personal information on visitors to our website. For the University of Minnesota policy, see www.privacy.umn.edu.